 |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly version
Medical Loss Ratio Reporting and Rebates
MLR Work Group comments to CMS on the proposed rule, Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2014, addressing proposed changes to the final rule on MLR. (December 31, 2012)
Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) Work Group comments to CMS on the exposure draft of the MLR annual reporting form. (February 14, 2012)
Medical Loss Ratio Regulation Work Group letter to HHS in response to an interim final rule on the medical loss ratio (MLR) provisions in the Affordable Care Act. (January 31, 2011)
Medical Loss Ratio Regulation Work Group letter to HHS addressing three components of the NAIC's proposed regulation on medical loss ratios: credibility adjustments, exclusion of federal taxes from the denominator, and the use of three months' runout. (November 5, 2010)
Medical Loss Ratio Regulation Work Group letter to the chair of the NAIC B Committee regarding the October 4 exposure draft of the proposed MLR rebate regulation. (October 8, 2010)
Medical Loss Ratio Regulation Work Group letter to HHS with input on credibility issues for the purpose of calculating rebates under the new MLR requirements. (August 20, 2010)
Medical Loss Ratio Regulation Work Group letter to the chair of the NAIC's Accident and Health Working Group offering input on the potential inclusion of a change in contract reserves in the numerator of the MLR rebate calculation. (June 7, 2010)
Medical Loss Ratio Regulation Work Group letter to the chair of the NAIC's Health Care Reform Solvency Impact Subgroup on an exposure draft of a new proposed financial reporting exhibit the Supplemental Health Care Exhibit. (May 17, 2010)
Medical Loss Ratio Regulation Work Group letter to the Department of Health and Human Services in response to its request for comments on the PPACA provision that requires medical loss ratio reporting and rebates. (May 14, 2010)
Medical Loss Ratio Regulation Work Group letter to the chair of the NAIC's Accident and Health Working Group responding to his request for input on defining an appropriate way to maintain statistical validity within the rebate process. The Academy sent a subsequent letter to respond to a request from the NAIC for more information on statistical credibility. (May 12, 2010)
