In The News/Media Activities
The Academy Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) Regulation Work Group's Oct. 8 letter to regulators regarding the NAIC's exposure draft of a regulation for MLR rebates was cited and linked by Kaiser Health News on Oct. 21. The work group wrote that, "Increasing the magnitude of the credibility adjustments may help keep insurance markets attractive to smaller competitors, which would enhance consumer choice."
Tom Keller, a member of the work group, was quoted by Politico's Pulse (click "Read the Whole Post") on Oct. 18 regarding the same issue. Keller said the work group is uncomfortable with the confidence interval being set at the 50th percentile level. He said the work group would like to see a higher confidence interval, but that the group has not specified what that percentile should be.
The work group did illustrate a 90th percentile level in its May 12 letter to regulators, but it said it was not endorsing that confidence interval. The work group's efforts were explained in more detail by "The Insurance Bellwether" blog on Oct. 14.
Academy Benefit and Eligibility Changes Work Group Chairperson Karen Bender was quoted by National Underwriter Life & Health on Sept. 27 from the work group's Aug. 27 letter to HHS commenting on interim final regulations regarding the elimination of preexisting condition exclusions, the elimination of lifetime limits and restrictions on annual limits, and other patient protections. "The combination of preexisting and guaranteed-issue rules may encourage a financially prudent family with healthy children to defer purchase of insurance until a child gets sick. As long as there is at least one carrier with an open-enrollment period available at any time during the year, and no penalty for deferral, then there is an economic incentive to defer purchase of insurance," Bender wrote.
News links are to external websites. The Academy is not responsible for the content of these websites.
|